commit 4f774c9f0895e9906b7892caa271072ebf542b75 Author: lowellbeggs281 Date: Mon Jun 16 20:02:08 2025 +0000 Add By not Stopping the Boats, pM is Signing his Political Death Warrant diff --git a/By-not-Stopping-the-Boats%2C-pM-is-Signing-his-Political-Death-Warrant.md b/By-not-Stopping-the-Boats%2C-pM-is-Signing-his-Political-Death-Warrant.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..37f6ca4 --- /dev/null +++ b/By-not-Stopping-the-Boats%2C-pM-is-Signing-his-Political-Death-Warrant.md @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +
Let's presume Sir [Keir Starmer](https://acebrisk.com) wishes to win the next [election](https://katbe.com). Let's likewise assume he has no desire to be changed as Prime Minister in the next year approximately by Wes Streeting or Angela Rayner or anyone else.
+
He's a political leader, after all, and politicians delight in power - Starmer more than most, I would think. I likewise suggest that he's at least averagely smart, and need to be able to weigh up the possibilities of any policy succeeding.
+
After the battles, compromises and humiliations associated with attaining high workplace, Starmer has no objective of tossing everything away. Why, then, does he reveal every indication of doing so?
+
On the single problem that might matter most to a majority of voters, he is speeding towards particular disaster, while denying himself any prospect of an . I indicate the boats coming across the Channel.
+
Numbers of migrants doing the 21-mile journey are up by 42 percent on the very same period in 2015. An analysis by The Times, utilizing comparable modelling as Border Force, forecasts that 50,000 people will cross the Channel in little boats in 2025. That would be a yearly record - and a stonking debacle for Sir Keir.
+
Peering into his mind, I reckon there are 2 main possible explanations for his behaviour. One is that he is deluding himself. He truly believes numbers will boil down when the measures he has taken start to work.
+
If Starmer still believes that his policies - tossing hundreds of millions at the French authorities, enhancing intelligence and using improved police powers - will reduce the numbers, that actually is the accomplishment of hope over experience. The other possibility is that he is currently starting poorly to realise that his stratagems will not bear much, if any, fruit. So he and the Government have actually chosen to pull the wool over our eyes. A deadly technique.
+
There have been two such examples in recent days. Having said in an online post on Monday that he felt 'upset' about the numbers crossing the Channel (how does he think the rest people feel !?) the PM made a slippery claim.
+
Sir Keir Starmer now has absolutely nothing powerful in his locker, Stephen Glover composes
+
Only 2,240 small-boat migrants were sent home in the 12 months to March, 3 percent fewer than in the previous year
+
He [boasted](https://thailandproperty.com) that 'practically 30,000 individuals' had been eliminated from the UK by this Government. Sounds good. But in fact this figure refers to all types of migrants who have no right to be in our nation. Only 2,240 small-boat migrants were sent home in the 12 months to March, 3 percent fewer than in the previous year.
+
A lie? Good God no! We mustn't accuse Labour prime ministers, far less Sir Keir Starmer KCB, PC, KC, MP, of telling deliberate fibs. Shall we go for a statistical deception?
+
The other circumstances of the Government not being entirely straight was the Home Office's claim earlier this week that there have actually been more migrants this year since of balmy weather. These are called 'red days', when the sea is calm.
+
But an [analysis](https://parvanicommercialgroup.com) by my associate David Barrett in the other day's Mail reveals that in temperate May in 2015 there were 21 'red days' but just 2,765 arrivals, about 1,000 less than last month. In gentle June 2024 there were 20 'red days', though only 3,007 migrants were taped crossing the [Channel](https://www.homesofrockies.com).
+
The most possible explanation is that last May and June the Government's strategy to send out illegal migrants to Rwanda had lastly cleared relentless judicial blockage. Some, at least, were discouraged from crossing the Channel for worry of being loaded off to the central African country.
+
The Rwanda plan was far from best - it was expensive, and liable to legal obstacle due to the fact that the nation has an authoritarian federal government - however a minimum of it had some possibility of hindering migrants. The inbound Labour Government discarded its only possible methods of [suppressing](https://www.22401414.com) the boats.
+
Good for Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, who in a speech tomorrow will undertake to reanimate a plan noticeably similar to the Rwandan one.
+
Starmer now has absolutely nothing formidable in his locker. Literally nothing. He can give additional millions to the French federal government but it won't make much, if any, difference. French authorities will still loll around on beaches, thinking about the sand castles they made as kids, as they see migrant boats setting off for Dover.
+
The reality is that the French will never strain themselves due to the fact that every migrant who leaves their coasts is one less migrant for them to fret about. It is ignorant to picture that they are ever going to be zealous on our behalf.
+
STEPHEN GLOVER: Keir Starmer is a soft guy who can not comprehend the real evil Britain is facing
+
Nor will Sir Keir's idea of improving intelligence and police be decisive. When it comes to Labour's reported intention to play with Article 8 of the Human Rights Act so as to [prevent phony](https://www.seasideapartments.co.za) asylum claims, that is welcome, but even if it ends up being law it is unlikely to have much effect on general numbers.
+
Are the PM and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper beginning to worry as they realise they do not have a single policy likely to satisfy their pledge of 'smashing the gangs'? If they aren't desperate, they jolly well ought to be.
+
Three weeks ago, Sir Keir was humiliated after he had actually applauded talks over Rwanda-style 'return centers' only minutes before his Albanian equivalent, standing a few feet away, eliminated any cooperation.
+
Maybe the Government will persuade the Kosovans or the North Macedonians to establish some sort of scheme. But if it does, it will take months, if not years, and people will wonder why Sir Keir cancelled an arrangement that he is at least partly trying to revive.
+
I've no specific wish to toss Starmer a lifeline but, as I've recommended before, there's one possible course out of the hole he has dug for himself - though it would take huge determination and guts for him to take it.
+
There are numerous uninhabited British islands off our coast and additional afield. Pick among them. Create a camp comparable to those on the Isle of Man that housed alien internees during the War. Build hundreds of huts - rather than putting up less tough camping tents, as ex-Reform MP Rupert Lowe has proposed.
+
Recruit doctors and [officials](https://www.eastpointeny.com) to [evaluate claims](https://syrianproperties.org) more quickly than occurs at present - and after that return most migrants to where they originated from. The cost of setting up such a camp would be a portion of the ₤ 4.3 billion invested in 2015 on housing migrants and asylum hunters.
+
Can anyone tell me why not? Few migrants would fancy kicking their heels for months in a camp, nevertheless humane, so it would be a wonderful deterrent. Cross the Channel, and you will be our guest - on a potentially windy island instead of in a four-star hotel.
+
Granted, in order to ward off vexatious legal obstacles we 'd probably need to derogate from the [European Court](https://lewisandcorealty.ca) of Human Rights, which would be an action too far for our mindful Prime Minister.
+
But he doesn't have a much better idea. In truth, he hasn't got any ideas at all that are liable to stem the growing numbers of [individuals streaming](https://homematch.co.za) throughout the English Channel.
[base-search.net](https://www.base-search.net/) +
Things can just become worse - and as they do Labour will sink ever lower in public esteem. Does Sir Keir Starmer actually desire to be the signatory of his own political death warrant?
+
RwandaAngela RaynerLabourWes Streeting
\ No newline at end of file